Pip: Welcome to Horidian News — where the questions are ancient, the stakes are eternal, and the sourcing is scripture.
Mara: Today we’re working through a piece from ONGORA DENISH that takes on one of the oldest theological debates in Christian history — whether Jesus Christ is God in the fullest sense, and what the biblical text actually says about it.
Pip: Let’s start with the evidence.
Jesus Christ Is The Almighty God: The Undeniable Biblical Evidence
Pip: The central question here is one that has divided theologians, churches, and entire denominations for centuries — is Jesus a prophet, a messenger, or God himself? The post sets out to answer that from scripture alone, working through both Testaments to build a cumulative case.
Mara: The Gospel of John is where the argument opens, and the post quotes directly: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Then John 1:14 follows — “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” The identification of that Word with Jesus is the post’s foundational move.
Pip: So the claim isn’t just that Jesus represented God — it’s that God himself entered human history in a body. That’s a different order of argument than saying someone was divinely appointed.
Mara: Right, and the post builds outward from there. Isaiah 9:6 is cited as Old Testament groundwork: “For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given… and His name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, The Mighty God, The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.” The argument is that the divine titles weren’t retroactively assigned — they were prophesied.
Pip: The Thomas moment is the one that tends to stop people cold.
Mara: John 20:28 — Thomas sees the risen Christ and says, “My Lord and my God.” The post’s point is that Jesus accepted that. Angels and prophets in scripture consistently refused worship. Jesus didn’t.
Pip: And then there’s the baptism pattern, which is where the post gets into territory most Sunday sermons skip.
Mara: This is the Pentecost evidence the post calls one of its strongest. Jesus commanded baptism in Matthew 28:19 “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” — but the apostles, post-Pentecost, baptized consistently in the name of Jesus Christ. Acts 2:38, Acts 8:16, Acts 10:48, Acts 19:5. The post reads that pattern as the apostles recognizing, after receiving the Holy Spirit, that the fullness of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost was contained in that one name.
Pip: So the upshot is that the apostolic practice wasn’t a contradiction — it was a theological conclusion reached under inspiration.
Mara: Exactly. Colossians 2:9 gets cited to anchor it: “For in Him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.” The post’s cumulative case — divine titles, accepted worship, authority to forgive sins, creative power, eternal self-identification — is that no single proof-text stands alone; they converge.
Pip: Which is precisely what makes this kind of argument hard to dismiss with a single counter-verse.
Mara: The closing note is Acts 4:12 and Philippians 2:9 through 11 — salvation in no other name, and every knee bowing to Jesus. The post frames that not as triumphalism but as the logical endpoint of the scriptural thread it’s been tracing from Genesis forward.
Pip: Heavy territory — and the kind that tends to follow you out of the room.
Mara: The thread running through all of this is the question of how identity is established — by title, by action, by what others say, or by what someone claims directly.
Pip: Scripture, apparently, votes yes to all four. More from Horidian News next time.
Leave a Reply